We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make certain legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or Woman usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they will cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by regulation.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed beneath have had opinions filed for them within the last 14 days. The following information is accessible for each case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, which includes signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that once the act of misconduct is set up as well as employee is found guilty after owing process of regulation, it is the prerogative with the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, out of the different penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed will not be proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct just isn't adequate even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful method. Read more
Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.
Because of this, merely citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling somebody to tell them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-these kinds of neighborhood, without actually offering them an address. Driving round the neighborhood attempting to find their phone more info is probably going for being more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is properly-settled that even though looking at the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to take into account the merit of the many qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to such suitable candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed with the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part from the respondent department.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by regulation." It really is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe like a foster child. Although the couple had two youthful children of their own at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had young children.
As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
States also typically have courts that take care of only a specific subset of legal matters, for example family legislation and probate. Case legislation, also known as precedent or common law, may be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending to the relationship between the deciding court plus the precedent, case law might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision because of the U.S. Court of Appeals for that Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) isn't strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by one district court in Big apple will not be binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning may possibly help guide the second court in reaching its decision. Decisions through the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more